From: | Tettenborn A.M. <a.m.tettenborn@swansea.ac.uk> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 07/01/2019 08:51:59 UTC |
Subject: | contributory negligence and debt |
Sneak preview of the next Prof Neg Law Reports: the obvious point that contributory negligence is irrelevant to a claim in debt. An everyday tale of a would-be Irish property millionaire who, when sued by his bank (or rather its assignee) for the money it had lent to him, said his repayment should be reduced because the bank had been very stupid to lend him the money in the first place. Nice try.
See Launceston Property Finance v Walls [2018] IEHC 610; [2019] P.N.L.R. 11.
Andrew
Andrew Tettenborn Professor of Commercial Law, Swansea University
Institute for International Shipping and Trade Law
| Andrew Tettenborn Athro yn y Gyfraith Fasnachol, Prifysgol Abertawe
Sefydliad y Gyfraith Llongau a Masnach Ryngwladol |
See us on Twitter: @swansea_dst
Read the IISTL Blog: iistl.wordpress.com
Read Andrew's other writing here and here
Disclaimer: This email (including any attachments) is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and all copies from your system. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other form of unauthorized dissemination of the contents is expressly prohibited. |